Orthopedic injuries are among the most common issues involved in personal injury claims, from herniated discs and shoulder injuries to knee damage, fractures, and chronic musculoskeletal pain.
When the defense requests a medical examination, the results can become an important part of the case.
A defense medical exam in an orthopedic injury case may appear routine, but small details during the examination can later become significant. What tests were performed? How long did the examination last? Were the plaintiff’s reported symptoms accurately reflected? Did the physician perform the testing described in the final report?
For plaintiff attorneys, understanding what happens during an orthopedic defense medical exam can help protect the integrity of the medical evidence.
What Is an Orthopedic Defense Medical Exam?
A defense medical exam, sometimes referred to as an independent medical examination or IME, is an examination requested by the defense to evaluate a plaintiff’s injuries, symptoms, limitations, diagnosis, or prognosis.
In an orthopedic case, the examining physician may evaluate conditions involving the:
- Neck and cervical spine
- Back and lumbar spine
- Shoulders
- Hips
- Knees
- Ankles
- Arms and legs
- Joints
- Muscles, ligaments, and tendons
Depending on the injury, the physician may also evaluate strength, mobility, pain complaints, range of motion, gait, or functional limitations.
What Happens During an Orthopedic Defense Medical Exam?
The exact examination will vary depending on the alleged injury and the physician performing the evaluation.
A typical orthopedic DME may include a medical history, discussion of current symptoms, physical examination, and orthopedic testing.
The physician may ask the plaintiff about:
- How the injury occurred
- Previous injuries or surgeries
- Current pain levels
- Activities that increase symptoms
- Treatment received
- Medications
- Work limitations
- Daily activities
The physical portion of the exam may include range-of-motion testing, strength testing, reflex testing, palpation, gait observation, or orthopedic maneuvers designed to evaluate a particular joint or area of the body.
Those details matter because the physician’s eventual report may rely heavily on what allegedly occurred during the examination.
Range-of-Motion Testing Can Be Especially Important
Range-of-motion findings frequently appear in orthopedic defense medical reports.
The examiner may evaluate how far a plaintiff can bend, rotate, extend, or move an injured joint or area of the spine.
However, range-of-motion testing can vary depending on how the test is performed.
Questions that may later become relevant include:
- Was the range of motion measured with an instrument?
- Was the result visually estimated?
- Was the plaintiff asked to move actively?
- Did the examiner physically move the joint?
- Did the plaintiff report pain during the movement?
- Was the test performed more than once?
When the examination is accurately documented, attorneys have an independent record of how the testing actually occurred.
Orthopedic Tests Should Match the Injury Being Evaluated
Orthopedic physicians use numerous specialized maneuvers to evaluate specific injuries.
Depending on the case, an examination may involve testing associated with spinal nerve irritation, shoulder instability, ligament injuries, meniscus damage, joint mobility, or other musculoskeletal conditions.
An attorney reviewing the final DME report may see references to specific tests and results.
That makes contemporaneous documentation valuable.
If a report states that multiple orthopedic tests were performed, a nurse observer’s notes or recording can help determine whether those tests were actually conducted and how they were performed.
The Plaintiff’s Words Matter
Orthopedic defense medical examinations typically include questions about pain, limitations, and daily activities.
A statement made casually during the examination can later appear differently in the physician’s report.
For example, there can be an important difference between:
“I can walk for about 20 minutes before my knee begins hurting.”
and
“Patient reports being able to walk without difficulty.”
The difference may seem subtle, but it can significantly change how the plaintiff’s functional ability is portrayed.
Having an objective record of the examination can help attorneys verify exactly what was asked and how the plaintiff responded.
Prior Injuries and Medical History May Become a Focus
In orthopedic cases, the examiner may ask detailed questions about prior injuries, accidents, surgeries, sports participation, or previous complaints involving the same body part.
This can be especially important when causation is disputed.
The defense may argue that symptoms are related to:
- A pre-existing condition
- Degenerative changes
- An earlier injury
- A prior surgery
- Age-related changes
- An unrelated medical condition
A well-documented examination helps establish exactly what medical history was discussed and what information the plaintiff provided.
Why the Length of the Examination Can Matter
Orthopedic DME reports can sometimes be extensive, describing detailed histories, multiple physical tests, and numerous clinical observations.
The actual examination, however, may be relatively brief.
Documenting the start and end time of the examination provides attorneys with another objective data point when reviewing the eventual report.
If a lengthy report describes an extensive examination, contemporaneous documentation can help determine whether the scope of the report accurately reflects what occurred.
Comparing the DME Report With What Actually Happened
One of the most valuable uses of a nurse observer’s documentation occurs after the physician’s report is received.
The attorney can compare the report against the independent record of the examination.
Potential discrepancies may involve:
- Tests documented but not observed
- Statements attributed to the plaintiff that differ from what was said
- Range-of-motion findings that do not match the testing performed
- Incomplete documentation of pain responses
- Differences in the reported duration of the examination
- Functional limitations that were minimized or omitted
- Medical history presented differently from how it was discussed
Not every difference is necessarily significant, but identifying discrepancies allows the legal team to evaluate the report with greater context.
The Role of a Legal Nurse Consultant During an Orthopedic DME
A legal nurse consultant can attend the examination as an objective medical observer.
The nurse does not interfere with the examination or instruct the plaintiff how to respond.
Instead, the nurse carefully documents what occurs.
Depending on the jurisdiction, court order, and circumstances of the examination, documentation may include:
- Examination start and end times
- Questions asked by the physician
- Responses provided by the plaintiff
- Physical and orthopedic tests performed
- Range-of-motion testing
- Pain responses
- Functional observations
- Interruptions or unusual events
- Audio documentation when permitted
This creates an independent record that the attorney can later compare with the defense physician’s report.
Why Orthopedic DMEs Require Careful Documentation
Orthopedic injury cases often depend heavily on subjective symptoms and physical findings.
Pain cannot always be seen on an imaging study.
Functional limitations may not be obvious during a brief office visit.
Range of motion, strength, tenderness, mobility, and symptom reproduction can all become important when evaluating an injury.
Because those findings may influence opinions regarding diagnosis, causation, impairment, future treatment, or work restrictions, accurate documentation of the examination can be especially valuable.
Nutris Legal Nurse Consultants Can Help
At Nutris Legal Nurse Consultants, we assist plaintiff attorneys with professional nurse observation of defense medical examinations.
Our nurses provide detailed, objective documentation of what occurs during the examination so legal teams have an independent record available when reviewing the defense physician’s final report.
In orthopedic injury cases, where physical testing, range of motion, pain responses, and functional limitations may play a central role, accurate documentation can provide valuable context.
If your client has an upcoming orthopedic defense medical exam, Nutris Legal Nurse Consultants can help ensure the examination is independently documented from a medical perspective.
Contact Nutris Legal Nurse Consultants to learn more about defense medical exam nurse observation services.
Leave a Reply